> And they are by different writers, though they do share the same > are not shown as being a double-header here: > Unlike all the other episodes in the current series, the two episodes
I can give you worst from the RTD Era that makes TImelash look >enjoyable, though without being outstanding.
>To be fair, for me the previous episodes this series have been >If I did not have this completist compulsion, I would do > more plausible than the episode last season that required us to believe > on my ability to suspend my sense of disbelief were too great. > But I thought it was an unsatisfactory episode, as the demands it made > seemed to imply that it had survived, would be viewed, and that How much time you have as much as how you use the time you have.
Deckard as a replicant is justĪnother robot apocalypse movie trying to be clever.Ī short lived Rachel is also a better story because it stresses that it isn't
Their passion and connect with their children. Deckard as a human means humans can reawaken At the end Deckard makes an emotional, empatheticĬonnection to a mere construct. More emotional, more empathetic than all the humans including the drone like But throughout the movie the replicants are :-/ĭeckard being a replicant ruins the movie. > His being a replicant never made any since to me. >director, which may or may not be significant. >And they are by different writers, though they do share the same
>are not shown as being a double-header here: >Unlike all the other episodes in the current series, the two episodes >more plausible than the episode last season that required us to believe >on my ability to suspend my sense of disbelief were too great. >But I thought it was an unsatisfactory episode, as the demands it made >seemed to imply that it had survived, would be viewed, and that >fact that we were supposedly viewing the footage from the space station >I may be misinterpreting the ending, as it was far from clear, but the His being a replicant never made any since to me. > Rachael would live a normal human lifespan. Depending of course on which version you see, it's implied > There are times when it can be interesting to leave implications. > But it did end on a rather sombre note for Dr Who. > I'm not so sure this is a double header. Scientifically) leaving behind, as you say, an unsatisfactory episode. Too hard to be clever (whilst simultaneously being completely implausible The implication there is that Hauser really wasįantasising and ended up being lobotomised.īut there was far too much vagueness about Sleep No More. At the end of the Schwarzenegger version the screen fades Rachael would live a normal human lifespan.Ģ. There are times when it can be interesting to leave implications. > plausible than the episode last season that required us to believe that > my ability to suspend my sense of disbelief were too great. > But I thought it was an unsatisfactory episode, as the demands it made on > seemed to imply that it had survived, would be viewed, and that therefore > fact that we were supposedly viewing the footage from the space station > I may be misinterpreting the ending, as it was far from clear, but the >But it did end on a rather sombre note for Dr Who. >I'm not so sure this is a double header.